I don’t get this. Why are Iowa and New Hampshire such benchmarks of political greatness? Why have we let them convince us that they are so relevant in the political process? I mean if we up and moved the nation’s first primaries to North Dakota and Wyoming, would anyone outside those states really think any differently. So the candidates would pay more attention to North Dakota and Wyoming instead of Iowa and New Hampshire? Besides the coffers of Iowa and New Hampshire, what real difference would it make?
Honestly, I just dont understand.




0 Responses to “Iowa vs. New Hampshire vs. Relavancy”